Community Split, Casino vs. Connectivity in Metropolitan Park

Courtesy SHoP Architects, Field Operations

 

By MOHAMED FARGHALY
mfarghaly@queensledger.com

 

A transformative $8 billion infrastructure proposal, the Metropolitan Park
development, is making significant strides as New York Mets owner Steve Cohen and
Hard Rock International push forward with plans to reshape the area around Citi
Field in Queens. The ambitious project, which envisions a sprawling casino, hotel,
and entertainment complex, has been made possible by recent legislation
introduced by State Senator John Liu. The legislation allows for the use of parkland
surrounding Citi Field for the construction of the casino, hotel, and related facilities,
which has been a key hurdle for the project to move forward.

The project, which recently received approval from the City Council in a 41-2 vote,
has now cleared a major regulatory hurdle. In addition to this massive project is the
caveat of the creation of the Flushing Skypark, a pedestrian and bicycle bridge that
will span Flushing Creek and connect downtown Flushing to Willets Point. Liu has
emphasized the importance of community connectivity and infrastructure
improvements, which have become a focal point of the project. The Skypark,
inspired by Manhattan’s High Line, will not only serve as a crossing but also a
destination, featuring recreational spaces, public areas, and flexible hubs for
community gatherings.

Senator Liu, who has long been an advocate for expanding Queens’ pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure, believes that the Skypark will help address gaps in the
borough’s connectivity while also providing a vibrant public space.

“It’s going to be esthetically attractive, it’s environmentally sound, and it would not
only be a way for people to get to and from either side of the Flushing Creek, but it

would also instead be its own destination, because it’ll have space for people to hang
out, to congregate, to rest, whatever people would do in an actual park.”

Courtesy Community Board 7

As part of the project’s development, Liu is introducing legislation that will allow for
the use of the land surrounding Citi Field for the construction of a casino, hotel, and
related facilities. The legislation is seen as a necessary step for Cohen to submit his
application to the Gaming Commission for approval to build the casino. Liu,
however, made it clear that his support is not an endorsement of the casino itself
but rather a way to ensure that the broader project, including infrastructure
improvements like the Skypark, moves forward.

“My bill allows his application to move forward and there are potential benefits that
would come to the community if he were to win the casino proposal, but without
this legislation, he can’t even submit the proposal,” Liu said.

The Metropolitan Park project has drawn mixed reactions, with some local residents
and advocacy groups expressing concerns over the impact of the casino on their
communities. Critics argue that it will contribute to displacement, increase traffic
congestion, and privatize public parkland.

In response, Cohen and Hard Rock International have committed to ensuring that
community benefits are a key part of the project, including a binding agreement
with the Waterfront Alliance, a regional community organization. If for any reason
the Flushing Skypark cannot be completed, Cohen and Hard Rock have pledged to
allocate $100 million for infrastructure improvements at Flushing Meadows Corona
Park.

“As I have made abundantly clear for more than a year, the Metropolitan Park plan is
a grand slam for Northwest Queens — a region of our borough that has historically
been minimized, marginalized and maligned,” Queens Borough President Donovan
Richards Jr said. “In a time of growing economic uncertainty, this revolutionary
project would create 23,000 good-paying union jobs, unlocking new levels of
upward mobility for families across Corona, Flushing and beyond. Meanwhile, a
nine-figure community improvement fund, a 25-acre park, a Queens-specific food
hall that will boost countless local small businesses will generate positive outcomes
for generations of area families.”

Courtesy Fed Up Coalition

Despite these promises, community opposition has been vocal. Local groups have
raised concerns about the potential harm the casino could bring to the
neighborhood, particularly regarding economic exploitation and the social impacts

of gambling. Residents from Flushing, Corona, Jackson Heights, and East Elmhurst
have rallied together at the end of March to oppose the project, urging Governor
Kathy Hochul to reject the idea of casino development on public parkland.

“A casino at Citi Field will only make things worse,” long-time Corona resident
Marilyn Mendoza said. “We already deal with unbearable traffic and parking issues
every time there’s a game at the stadiums, and with a new stadium being built
against our community’s wishes, we are being ignored yet again. Adding a casino on
top of that will increase congestion, drive up rents, and bring more harm than good.
Instead of a casino that preys on our community, we need real
investments—affordable housing, good jobs, and resources that help families thrive.
I urge our leaders to listen to us and put our community first. We deserve better.”

Environmental groups have also voiced opposition, arguing that the development
threatens the area’s public parkland and fails to address crucial climate resilience
issues. Rebecca Pryor, Executive Director of the Guardians of Flushing Bay,
emphasized that the project’s proposal would privatize significant portions of public
land, limiting access to park spaces that are essential for local residents.

“The proposed project is for Flushing Meadows Corona Park, which is formed in the
path of Flushing Creek and one of the most flood-prone parks in the city”, said
Rebecca Pryor, the Executive Director of the Guardians of Flushing Bay. “Any
development in an NYC public park should be a meaningful investment in the city’s
public parkland. Queens Future’s Vegas-like casino fails this basic requirement

“For the City of New York to allow such an entity on public land is unacceptable,”
Memo Salazar, Board Co-Chair of the Western Queens Community Land Trust said.
“The precious few parcels of public land left in this city should be used to address
the many dire needs New Yorkers- and Queens residents in particular- face: open
space, community centers, and truly affordable housing, to name a few.”

For more details, readers can visit queensforall.com to access resources and support
those opposing the Metropolitan Park project.

Despite these concerns, Liu has stood firm in his belief that the Metropolitan Park
project, particularly the Skypark, can provide long-term benefits for Queens,
creating new public spaces while enhancing connectivity.

“Senator Liu has been a champion for infrastructure and a lifelong advocate for
Flushing. As an organization based in Willets Point, we shared the community’s

concerns around connectivity and recognized that the Skypark would be a great way
to bring Queens together,” said New York Mets owner Steve Cohen. “Metropolitan
Park is committed to working to make Flushing Skypark a reality. And if for any
reason we cannot, then we will still follow through on our commitment to the
community by dedicating $100 million to the betterment of Flushing Meadows
Corona Park.”

Over 100 Officials Challenge “City of Yes” Zoning Reform

Courtesy Office of Council Member Joann Ariola

MOHAMED FARGHALY

mfarghaly@queensledger.com

In a bold move to challenge New York City’s ambitious zoning reform, the City Council’s Common Sense Caucus, joined by over 100 elected officials, civic organizations, and concerned residents, has filed a lawsuit to overturn the controversial “City of Yes” zoning overhaul. The lawsuit, filed last week in the New York Supreme Court in Richmond County, argues that the city violated fundamental environmental laws during the passage of the sweeping rezoning plan.

The lawsuit targets the city’s failure to comply with both the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR), specifically accusing the administration of neglecting necessary environmental assessments. According to the suit, the city’s adoption of the new zoning rules disregarded established procedures meant to ensure the protection of New Yorkers and their neighborhoods.

“Respondents violated their environmental obligations in at least three critical ways: first, by failing to take a ‘hard look’ at significant areas of environmental concern without providing a rational basis or reasoned elaboration for this failure; second, by segmenting City of Yes (‘Rezoning’) into three distinct stages as if each stage were independent, this violation of law served to avoid assessing the cumulative impacts of each phase of the Rezoning; and finally, Respondents overhauled New York City Zoning without proposing any mitigation or any rational explanation for failing to propose reasonable alternatives that offered mitigation,” the lawsuit alleges.

Opponents of the “City of Yes” have been vocal in their criticism of the plan, which they argue prioritizes development over the needs of local communities during the announcement at city hall on March 26.

Minority Leader Joann Ariola, who has been a leading voice in opposition, asserted that the rezoning effort was not about addressing the city’s housing crisis, but about making way for large-scale developers to push through projects with little regard for environmental or social consequences.

“The City of Yes was never really about solving an economic or housing ‘crisis’ – it was about clearing the decks for big development in our communities, then trying to deceive the public into believing it would have no negative environmental consequences or impact on our quality of life,” Ariola said. “The lawsuit we filed today makes it clear that not only did the city lie to us all, it broke the law in the process. It is the culmination of a diverse, citywide grassroots movement of residents who refuse to have their neighborhoods destroyed or their rights trampled.”

The “City of Yes” initiative, which aims to address the city’s housing shortage, was divided into three phases: Zoning for Carbon Neutrality (approved in December 2023), Zoning for Economic Opportunity (approved in June 2024), and Zoning for Housing Opportunity (approved in December 2024). Despite the plan’s goal to create more housing options, it faced strong opposition, especially the final phase, which was rejected by 38 of the city’s 59 community boards and nearly half of the New York City Council Members.

Each of the plan’s three phases was subject to its own Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which controversially concluded that the expected influx of new development and density would have “no significant” negative effects on surrounding communities. Critics have disputed these findings, pointing out the strain on infrastructure, public services, and the environmental challenges faced by many already-overburdened neighborhoods.

“The Rezoning represented a wholesale departure from longstanding public policy that respects open space, air and light, stress on infrastructure and the neighborhood character of vast areas of New York City’s low-density communities,” the lawsuit concludes. “To have undertaken this Rezoning contrary to the requirements of basic environmental law must result in a nullification of Respondents’ unlawful behavior.”

The backlash has been broad and includes Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa, who praised the Common Sense Caucus and the civic groups for taking legal action against the Adams administration’s rezoning plan. Sliwa, a vocal critic of the “City of Yes,” warned that the zoning changes were a “top-down scheme” that ignored public input.

Courtesy Office of Council Member Robert Holden

“This lawsuit is a wake-up call to City Hall that New Yorkers will not be steamrolled,” said Sliwa. “The City of Yes is nothing more than a land grab for developers at the expense of the working and middle-class New Yorkers who built this city.”

Sliwa has also raised concerns about the potential risks posed by a specific aspect of the plan—its provision for lithium-ion battery storage facilities. These sites would be placed across the city, including residential and low-density areas, which Sliwa deems a safety hazard.

“New Yorkers should not have to live next to ticking time bombs,” Sliwa said. “The City of Yes put profit over public safety, and as mayor, I’ll fight to reverse that.”

City Council Member Robert Holden, another outspoken critic of the plan, has joined the lawsuit as a citizen plaintiff. Holden has called for the city to abandon the “reckless” rezoning initiative, emphasizing that local communities should not be undermined in favor of developers.

“I’m proud to be a citizen plaintiff alongside civic advocates Tony Nunziato, Alicia Vaichunas, and Phil Wong to say NO to the City of Yes,” Holden said. “This community rejects giving a blank check to developers—we will fight tooth and nail against this reckless plan.”

Council Member Robert Holden echoed Curtis Sliwa’s concerns, specifically criticizing the proposal to build a lithium-ion battery storage facility in Middle Village, directly across from PS/IS 128 and near an animal hospital and daycare centers. Holden called the plan “dangerous” and emphasized that such facilities do not belong in residential areas, vowing to fight the project “every step of the way.”

The “City of Yes for Housing Opportunity” initiative was designed to address New York City’s housing shortage by relaxing long-standing zoning rules. The plan aimed to provide more housing options across the city without overburdening any one neighborhood. The proposed rezoning changes are expected to enable the creation of 82,000 new homes over the next 15 years.

While proponents argue that the plan is necessary to tackle the city’s housing crisis and bring down costs, opponents remain steadfast in their belief that it could have far-reaching and negative consequences for local neighborhoods, their residents, and the city’s infrastructure.

This Will Not be the Typical Mayors Race

By Robert Hornak

The very complex and highly technical process of collecting nominating petitions to get on the ballot for this year’s citywide elections just concluded. And there are a few interesting surprises that could make this one of the most competitive and wide-open mayoral elections in decades. 

First, we have dozens of candidates filed to run for mayor. This is no doubt due to the incredible unpopularity of Eric Adams. Even after having the charges against him mercifully dropped, his political career still appears to be over. Adams recently dropped the bombshell that he won’t even run in the Democrat primary for reelection, but instead as an independent. 

Recent polls have shown that among Democrat primary voters Adams is less popular than even President Trump. Corruption allegations aside, voters still think he’s done a very poor job as mayor and does not deserve another four years to do more of the same. Adams surely senses this is the end for him, even if he doesn’t want to admit it. Were he to run in the Democrat primary and lose badly, his status as a lame duck would be cemented for the rest of his term. 

But by declaring his candidacy as an independent, he stays in the race until November, delaying the inevitable while being able to fool himself into thinking he might be able to turn things around by the time the general election rolls around. 

Then there’s the Democrat primary in June, with Andrew Cuomo far and away the frontrunner. All the players in the Democratic Party are lining up with Cuomo, including all the unions that typically matter. They see him as the likely winner and want to be able to take some of the credit for his miraculous comeback around contract negotiation time. 

In a massive field, socialist Assemblyman Zohran Mamdami is holding on to a distant second place. But in multiple ranked choice voting simulations, Mamdami falls to third place, showing that his support, while very passionate and full of youthful energy, doesn’t attract many second choice rankings and his ability to grow is likely very limited. Even most NYC Democrats don’t like his socialist and antisemitic positions. 

The exception is the Working Families Party, which in recent years has not worked well with the Democratic Socialist candidates. But their passion is built on a hatred of Cuomo, who as governor changed the ballot access rules for party organizations to achieve a permanent line on the ballot in order to kill the WFP. 

The WFP submitted petitions for a candidate named Gowri Krishna, but he is surely a place holder until after the June primary when they will make the ultimate decision on who to give their line to. They recently endorsed four of the Democrats running, including Mamdami, but are waiting to see how each ultimately performs and has the best chance to derail Cuomo.

Then there is the Republican primary, with nine candidates filing petitions to run. However, because of the hyper-technical nature of the process and the difficulty of getting valid Republican signatures, many if not most of these candidates will get knocked off the ballot. 

Guardian Angels founder and WABC radio host Curtis Sliwa is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, and with all five Republican County organizations collecting petitions for him, he’s sure to survive any potential petition challenge. 

Then there is another independent candidate, powerhouse lawyer and former federal prosecutor James Walden. Walden is a centrist Democrat who skipped the messy party primary and is just running in the November general election. 

The big question this year is can independent candidates break through all the noise the media makes around major party candidates while trying to overcome the barriers for independents in a very strong two-party system?

Instead of the typical “choose one from column A or one from column B” general election, we could have multiple well-financed candidates running in November from across the political spectrum. 

And with the wide-open contest this campaign is looking to become, other independent candidates could be inspired to jump in. If Walden or any other independent candidate captures the voters’ attention this year, it could be a very fascinating election with a very unpredictable result. 

Robert Hornak is a professional political consultant who has previously served as the Deputy Director of the Republican Assembly Leader’s NYC office and as Executive Director of the Queens Republican Party. He can be reached at rahornak@gmail.com and @RobertHornak on X.

 

 

NYC Ramadan Night Market Unites Communities

MOHAMED FARGHALY

mfarghaly@queensledger.com

Steinway Street became a vibrant hub of culture, flavor, and connection on March 13 as Malikah hosted its second annual NYC Ramadan Night Market. The stretch between 28th Avenue and 25th Avenue was alive with the sounds of bustling crowds, the aromas of halal street food, and the colorful display of modest fashion and handmade goods from Muslim-owned businesses.

The night market wasn’t just a feast for the senses—it also served a larger purpose as a fundraiser for Malikah. The event’s proceeds went directly to the organization’s mutual aid fund, supporting efforts to uplift and protect vulnerable communities. As attendees enjoyed an eclectic mix of local vendors, they also helped fuel Malikah’s mission of empowerment and solidarity.

Guests savored diverse culinary delights and discovered one-of-a-kind creations, all within a warm, inclusive atmosphere that celebrated Muslim culture in New York.

“We couldn’t be more excited about the success of this past week’s Malikah Ramadan Night Market. With over 30 amazing vendors and thousands of community members, it was truly a celebration of everything that makes our community so special. Malikah’s mission has always been to support small businesses, create space for connection, and bring joy, especially during such an important time of year for all of us. Seeing the energy, the love, and the unity at the event reminded us why we do this work. It was a beautiful opportunity to come together, lift each other up, and celebrate our shared values.” Rana Abdelhamid, Executive Director and Founder of Malikah said.

Small Businesses in NYC Seek REAP Extension

Courtesy Ferrara Manufacturing

MOHAMED FARGHALY

mfarghaly@queensledger.com

As the cost of living continues to rise in New York City, particularly in the borough of Queens, Governor Kathy Hochul is pushing a key tax incentive aimed at spurring business growth and job creation. The Relocation and Employment Assistance Program (REAP) is designed to help businesses move to areas like Queens, providing crucial support at a time when small businesses are struggling with inflation, high rent, and competition from neighboring states.

Since its inception, REAP has successfully attracted businesses to Queens by offering tax credits for relocating jobs from outside the city or Manhattan below 96th Street to designated areas in the city’s outer boroughs. The program has been particularly beneficial for small businesses, which make up the backbone of Queens’ economy. With a growing need for affordable and sustainable business opportunities, local leaders and economic development advocates are urging for the program’s extension beyond its current expiration in 2025.

Tom Grech, President of the Queens Chamber of Commerce, explained the significance of the program. “The most important part about all of this is that the rest of the world is not waiting for New York to figure out how to be efficient and affordable,” Grech said. “This program helps level the playing field, especially for small businesses, and allows them to compete in a city that’s becoming increasingly expensive.”

The REAP program offers businesses a $3,000 tax credit per eligible employee for up to twelve years if they relocate to qualifying locations in Queens or other outer boroughs. These designated areas are typically revitalization zones in the city’s industrial and commercial districts. In areas outside these zones, businesses can still receive a $1,000 annual credit for each qualifying employee. With benefits like these, REAP has become an attractive option for businesses seeking to expand or relocate to Queens.

Queens is home to roughly 57,000 small businesses, many of which are struggling to survive amid rising operational costs. “90% of those businesses have 10 or fewer employees,” Grech said, emphasizing the challenges of sustaining these enterprises. “This effort has been on the books for years, helping ensure that small businesses can stay open in places like Queens.”

Despite its success, REAP faces an uncertain future. Coalition members from the Five Borough Jobs Campaign, a coalition of local economic development corporations, business improvement districts, and businesses, are advocating for the program’s continued support. The coalition, which is focused on bringing new jobs to New York’s communities, believes REAP is vital to addressing the affordability crisis and ensuring that small businesses have access to the resources they need to thrive.

The program’s extension is currently under consideration in this year’s state budget, with advocates urging state lawmakers to reaffirm its importance. Grech stressed that as New York recovers from the economic toll of the COVID-19 pandemic, supporting small businesses through programs like REAP is more crucial than ever.

“I think it’s really, really important to extend this program, especially as we look to rebuild in the post-COVID era,” Grech said. “This is about reaffirming our commitment to small businesses, which are the lifeblood of our community.”

Queens residents and business owners alike are hopeful that the state will continue to support the REAP program, ensuring that local businesses can prosper in the face of growing economic challenges. While the program’s future remains uncertain, advocates remain committed to fighting for the job creation and economic sustainability that businesses in Queens need to succeed.

The REAP program, which is slated to expire in June 2025, will play a key role in the future of business development in the outer boroughs. As local leaders push for an extension, the focus remains on securing a more affordable and equitable environment for businesses and workers across New York City.

For more information about the Five Borough Jobs Campaign, visit fiveboroughjobs.com, for more information about the the REAP program, visit tinyurl.com/reapnyc.

CORD MEYER DEVELOPMENT AGAIN SERVES AS PREMIER SPONSOR OF FRIENDS OF CROCHERON & JOHN GOLDEN PARK

All are invited to participate in the Cord Meyer Park Cleanup on Saturday, April 12th.

For the fourth year in a row, Cord Meyer Development will serve as the Premier Sponsor of Friends of Crocheron & John Golden Park, a not-for-profit organization that works alongside New York City Parks to advocate for improvements to the 63-acre park situated at 214th Street and 35th Avenue in Bayside, Queens. The joint announcement was made by Friends of Crocheron & John Golden Park Founding President Jessica Burke and Cord Meyer Vice President and Bay Terrace Project Lead Joe Forgione.

“All of us at Friends of Crocheron & John Golden Park are thrilled that Cord Meyer has again stepped up as our Premier Sponsor,” explained Burke. “As a volunteer-run organization, we depend on outside funding to accomplish our many goals. It’s been a pleasure partnering with Cord Meyer these past three years and we look forward to their participation in 2025, beginning with the Cord Meyer Park Cleanup on Saturday, April 12th.”

According to Burke, the cleanup event runs from 10 AM – 12 PM and is open to everyone, with refreshments provided and free T-shirts available on a first-come basis. Participants will meet at the Tennis Court House at 215th Place and 33rd Road and are asked to register first at www.crocheronpark.org/volunteer-registration.

Founded in 1904, Cord Meyer is a developer, owner, and operator of retail, commercial, and residential properties in Queens, including its historic Bay Terrace Shopping Center, located less than one mile from Crocheron Park.

“One of our top priorities is to have a positive impact in the neighborhoods we do business,” observed Forgione. “Working with Jessica and her group is a great partnership between the two main meeting places for the neighborhood. Historically, Crocheron Park and the Bay Terrace Shopping Center are destinations where the entire community comes together.”

Founded in 2020, Friends of Crocheron & John Golden Pond assists NYC Parks in stewardship of the parkland, which today consists of Crocheron Park and the adjoining John Golden Park. By protecting environmentally sustainable functions of the pond, woodlands, and gardens, the volunteer organization helps support pollinator populations, wildlife, and biodiversity while also creating environments that support educational endeavors. More information is available at www.crocheronpark.org.

More information on Cord Meyer Development Company is available at www.cordmeyer.com.

#     #     #

Kora Opens To Fanfare in Sunnyside

Kora, the bakery that social media loves, opened its doors at its new Sunnyside location Saturday morning. More than a hundred people lined up along Greenpoint Avenue down and around 45th Street at 9am, as owners Kevin and Kimberly cut the ribbon. In front of the store at 45-18 Greenpoint Avenue, included in the picture are George Hadjiconstantinou, from the  Queens Chamber of Commerce, Dirk McCall, director of Sunnyside Shines and State Senator Mike Gianaris.

Dems Clean Energy Dream Looks Like a NY Nightmare

By Robert Hornak

Democrats have made eliminating fossil fuels one of their top priorities. Their plan for a green new deal has been insinuated into almost every facet of our lives, with attacks on everything from automobiles to gas stoves. 

Opponents have long argued that their plans are way too costly with unachievable goals, not to mention calling into question the entire basis for their alarmism – that human activity is not affecting the global climate in any significant way. 

Nevertheless, they have gone full speed ahead passing mandates to phase out fossil fuels and transition almost entirely to wind and solar. In 2019, NY passed a law mandating that both energy producers and consumers cut carbon emissions 40% by 2030 and be 100% zero-carbon electricity by 2040. 

Many objected, saying that NY was nowhere near on track to meet those goals. But now a pro-renewable voice has chimed in, agreeing with the critics on the unrealistic timeline set by NY’s obsessed politicians. The New York Affordable Clean Power Alliance, a special interest group supporting solar and wind producers, has released a shocking new report that declares these mandates a looming disaster for New Yorkers. 

NY has already seen skyrocketing electricity costs. In the first year after the closure of the Indian Point nuclear plant – which supplied 25% of NYC’s total electricity and 80% of its renewable power – the wholesale price of electricity doubled. 

There was nothing wrong with Indian Point, it just didn’t fit into the Democrats political plans. The excuse by then Gov. Cuomo was it could be in danger from earthquakes and terrorists. They want to save the world, but not if it means using nuclear power. 

And as most consumers are now aware, Con Edison is looking to hike rates again by another 11% (citing in part the cost of complying with government mandates). But the real pain hasn’t even begun yet. 

NY is trying to push everything onto the electricity grid. That’s on top of the natural increase in demand driven by our love for modern technology. Our reliance on cell phones, the internet, gaming, and all the gadgets we use on a daily basis are driving demand up exponentially. That’s not touching on things like crypto mining and its incredible demand for electricity. 

Government is adding to the demand by trying to mandate everything run on electricity. In NYC, Local Law 97 is about to force co-op and condo homeowners to replace all gas and coal powered heating systems with electric heaters. Putting aside the incredibly unaffordable cost of doing this for these mostly middle-class homeowners, the insult added on will be the continued increase in the cost of electricity as this adds to the demand for supply. 

According to the Alliance’s report, “The New York City area is forecasted to experience a generation shortfall starting in 2033, driven by an increase in peak demand and the planned retirement of existing dispatchable generation.” It continues, “New York faces hurdles in maintaining reliability due to ambitious renewables targets, the projected retirement of much of its flexible fossil generation fleet, growing load, and extreme weather.”

Then the clincher, “Unlike fossil fuel plants, which provide dispatchable generation around the clock, renewables depend on weather conditions, making real-time supply and demand balancing more complex.”

So now they admit that in addition to the growing cost of these renewable projects, they just aren’t nearly as reliable as traditional energy sources. The final nail in the report on the rising cost of these projects was, “These cost pressures affect all types of developers and would also drive up utilities’ costs if they were permitted to build large scale renewables.”

Meanwhile, these large-scale projects are falling apart all over the state. Some, like the Lighthouse Wind project, are just being cancelled due to rising costs and community opposition. Others are being downsized or delayed indefinitely. And transmission limitations, from upstate where the new projects are being planned to downstate where most of the demand is, are also driving up costs. 

All of this appears to be a perfect storm for New York that could make the cost of electricity the breaking point for many already strapped taxpayers looking for some relief in the cost of living here but finding only pain. 

Robert Hornak is a professional political consultant who has previously served as the Deputy Director of the Republican Assembly Leader’s NYC office and as Executive Director of the Queens Republican Party. He can be reached at rahornak@gmail.com and @RobertHornak on X.

 

 

“Queens, The World’s Borough” Sculpture Unveiled at MacDonald Park” Park

By Alice Moreno

On March 22, hundreds of Queens residents came together to celebrate community, diversity, and love with the unveiling of a new sculpture at MacDonald Park in Forest Hills. The sculpture — a blue, red, and white (the borough’s flag colors) statue in the same typewriter font used during the I NY campaign that says “Queens, The World’s Borough” — is based on the borough’s tagline. Queens houses people from all over the world; in fact, there are more than 130 languages spoken in the borough alone. 

The celebration kicked off with speeches from Larry Ng, who designed the sculpture, and various Queens officials, such as the borough president Donovan Richards, Jr. and District Attorney Melinda Katz. Representatives from Northwell Health and Queens Rising were in attendance as well, who helped organize the event. Even Mrs. Mets, the mascot of the New York Mets attended, bringing smiles to patrons and children alike. 

All speeches given had a common theme: their love for their borough. 

MacDonald Park”

“To all of my friends in Queens County, we are an amazing borough,” said Nedelka Sotelo, a representative for Queens Rising, during her speech. “We make it work, every single day. We work together, we live together, [and] we go to school together. Our kids play together […] and we do it all year.”

Dancers then came to dazzle audiences with their impressive moves. In collaboration with Queens College School of the Arts, a salsa group from Queens Rising spun and moved their hips with rhythm to songs such as “Tu Con El” by Frankie Ruiz. They invited audience members to dance with them, with a sea of smiles surrounding the sign as everyone danced along. 

Queensboro Dance Festival also had dancers perform after the sculpture unveiling, showcasing the vast diversity of cultures in the borough. Countries such as Colombia, India, West Africa, and the state of Hawai’i each moved in a circle, each taking their turn in the middle to do a dance representative of their culture. 

“It’s very important for oneself to grow [and] adapt to the world and its obstacles,” said Valentina Olaya-Florez, a Colombian dancer from the Queensboro Dance Festival. “And I think it really helps to showcase that cultural identity. It’s important to understand and learn and teach to other people that it’s knowledgeable to connect with that part of yourself and your culture […] and to share that with the world as well.”

Towards the end of the event, a raffle was held, giving away three miniature versions of the sculpture and taking home a piece of Queens history.

This groundbreaking moment for Queens wouldn’t have occurred without the help of Larry Ng, the sculpture’s designer. 

Ng always felt that the borough is underrepresented. Between Manhattan being the epicenter and Brooklyn becoming a trendier spot for 20-somethings, he was interested in finding something unique about Queens. After doing some research, he came to realize how grandiose Queens diversity is, being home to 190 nationalities and even being in the Guinness Book of World Records for being the “most ethnically diverse urban area on the planet.”

After his discovery, Ng was on a mission to bring a sculpture to life, highlighting the borough’s tagline: “The World’s Borough.” 

Initially, the sculpture was originally going to be a Spider-Man sculpture, as he is regarded as a Queens icon and the character originated from Forest Hills. As Ng began to find new ideas, Kevin Sanichara — organizer of the unveiling event and one of the designers and coordinators of the sculpture — listened in and shared his grievances. Since then, Sanichara, alongside a team of architects, supporters, and volunteers, came together with Ng to bring the sculpture to life. 

“I was like, ‘Man, it sucks [that] you couldn’t get the Spider-Man’ [sculpture] up,” said Sanichara to Ng upon their first meeting. “But we didn’t want to give up, [so] we decided to kind of bring a storm and put this together, and we want to do something for Queens.”

The concept of the sculpture also came with a multitude of support from corporations and government officials alike. Northwell Health had heard about the initiative and offered their help by donating a large sum of the budget. 

From a $50,000 budget, Ng received vast donations from Northwell Health, private donors, and even a small GoFundMe campaign that was held, in which $5,000 was raised. 

“Northwell Health was instrumental in making [the sculpture] happen,” said Ng. “They gave money, they helped […] they reached out to [the] community. So, therefore, I really owe a lot to Northwell Health.”

In addition, the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation expedited its efforts into making the sculpture a part of the “Arts in the Park” program, which helps preserve and celebrate public artwork. 

With a central location on Queens Boulevard and easy to spot from any angle, the new “Queens The Worlds Borough” statue brings community together, celebrating the idea that Queens is indeed, home to the world. 

“When I was kind of working with [the sculpture during installation, ] I saw so many people take photos with it, especially little kids,” said Ng. “[These] two little girls jumped up [and said], ‘Mommy, mommy, I want to take a picture!’ So one wanted to sit on the “U” [and one] wanted to stick their head out of the Q. It’s kind of like, it’s just very heartwarming.”

To learn more about the “Queens, The World’s Borough” sculpture, visit https://www.queens-nyc.com/ 

Transfiguration Church Faces Uncertain Future Amid Financial Struggles

By MOHAMED FARGHALY
mfarghaly@queensledger.com

 

The future of Transfiguration Church, a historic and beloved institution in the Maspeth
community, is uncertain. Built in 1962 on Perry Avenue near 64th Street, the church has
served generations of residents, with roots tracing back to the early 1900s when it was
founded to support Lithuanian immigrants. The building has stood as a cornerstone of the
community for more than six decades, but now, financial pressures and the deterioration
of the church property have placed it in danger of closing.

The church’s financial struggles, detailed by Msgr. Monsignor Calise, the pastor of St.
Stanislaus Kostka Parish, highlighted the dire situation. The church has faced increasing
costs associated with repairs and maintenance of the property, but with a dwindling
congregation and fewer donations, it has become financially unsustainable. Repairs to the
church’s physical structure have been deferred, but the need for significant investment
has reached a point where Msgr. Calise believes the best option may be to sell the
property. The Diocese’s real estate division conducted an assessment, estimating that over
$1 million in repairs would be needed to keep the church functional. Without a growing
congregation to support these expenses, the idea of going into debt to fund repairs seems
untenable.

At present, around 160 to 200 people attend Sunday services, and the church has
struggled to attract new members. Neighboring parishes, such as St. Stanislaus Kostka,
benefit from a much larger congregation and stronger financial backing. St. Stanislaus, in
particular, has a thriving school with over 330 students and a strong community
foundation, leaving Transfiguration increasingly isolated in terms of both attendance and
financial support.

An assessment of the Transfiguration Church building has revealed several critical issues
that need urgent attention. The main roof, originally installed with three-tab asphalt
shingles, is at the end of its useful life and needs replacement. Additionally, the side aisle
roofs have experienced significant water damage, requiring complete replacement, with
potential asbestos testing. Concrete and paving around the church, especially near the
rectory and parking lot, are in poor condition and need extensive repairs, including
excavation and replacement of a potentially blocked or collapsed drain line. The rectory
has suffered from brick displacement, poorly installed windows contributing to water
damage, and requires upgrades to its heating system and possible asbestos removal. The

total cost for these repairs is estimated between $1.3 million and $1.5 million, which far
exceeds the church’s current budget, prompting the consideration of selling the property.

At a town hall meeting held on March 20, at Transfiguration Church, community
members voiced their concerns and frustrations. Many expressed outrage at the potential
closure of the church, viewing it as a blow to the heart of Maspeth. Longtime
churchgoers spoke about the deep emotional and spiritual connection they have to the
church, and the significance of Transfiguration in the history and culture of the
neighborhood.

The meeting revealed a shared sense of disbelief that the church might close, especially
given that it was financially solvent before its merger with St. Stanislaus Kostka in 2019.
Parishioners questioned what changes led to the decline in donations and attendance. Was
it the merger that created confusion? Were there actions taken that alienated long-time
supporters? The loss of the church would be devastating, not only as a place of worship
but as a historic landmark for the Lithuanian community, which has been a cornerstone of
the parish for over a century.

One key point raised at the meeting was the need to involve the younger generation.
Churchgoers emphasized the importance of engaging children and their parents in the life
of the church, encouraging families to return and support the church’s mission. The
community’s strength lies in its ability to rally together, and the hope is that renewed
involvement from families could help secure the future of Transfiguration.

Dr. Paul-Michael Kazas, President of the Knights of Lithuania Council 110, expressed
strong dissatisfaction with the town hall at Transfiguration Church. He felt the
information presented was misleading and intended to justify the potential sale and
demolition of the church. Kazas criticized the lack of discussion regarding the liabilities
and structural issues at Saint Stanislaus and questioned why the church had not pursued
grant opportunities, such as applying for National Register of Historical Sites status,
which could have helped fund repairs. He also pointed out contradictions in the church’s
statements, particularly regarding the church’s closure and the claim that no final decision
had been made. Kazas expressed frustration with the church’s response to efforts from the
Knights to engage the community and support the church, including organizing events
that raised funds. He argued that Transfiguration Church should not be closed or sold,
emphasizing that with proper repairs, parishioners would return, and the church could
continue to serve the community.

In an interview, Msgr. Monsignor Calise explained the difficult financial situation facing
the Transfiguration Church. He emphasized that while the church has been a beautiful
and integral part of the community for many years, attendance has dramatically decreased
to around 140 to 150 people per weekend. This has made it difficult to cover the monthly
expenses. Calise said that “the more people that come, obviously, the more donations

there’ll be. So it’s easier than to pay the bills.” Additionally, the church has lost some
rental income, and the aging buildings require costly repairs that the parish can’t afford.
Calise also called for more community involvement, saying, “What’s crucial is getting
people into the seats. If we can get people into the seats, then the parish stays open and
lively,” and stressed the importance of volunteer work and donations, although he
acknowledged that even those efforts may not be enough to cover the extensive repairs
needed.

The “Parish Health” report shows fluctuating trends in sacraments and mass attendance at
Transfiguration and St. Stanislaus Kostka from 2021 to 2024. Baptisms at
Transfiguration declined in 2023 but rebounded in 2024, while marriages dropped
significantly. Mass attendance varied, with some declines at Transfiguration, while St.
Stanislaus Kostka saw growth, especially in its 12:30 PM Spanish service, which nearly
doubled from 102 in 2021 to 186 in 2024.

Despite the grim outlook, no final decision has yet been made regarding the church’s
future. As the meeting concluded, the pastor assured the congregation that all options
were still on the table, including the possibility of selling some of the other properties
attached to the church in order to fund the repairs. The church’s fate, according to Msgr.
Calise, is not a decision to be made hastily.

Parishioners remain determined to explore every avenue, from securing additional
funding to organizing community efforts, in hopes of preserving the church that has
served as a spiritual home for many.

Fill the Form for Events, Advertisement or Business Listing