By Jean Brannum | jbrannum@queensledger.com

The Fordham Law Clinic filed a lawsuit on April 30 against the New York City Housing Authority and the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance due to its deprioritization of Emergency Rental Assistance Program funds for people in subsidized housing.

The complaint alleges that even though federal guidelines made many NYCHA residents eligible for Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) funds, tenants were left with pending requests for two years or told they were not eligible due to being in subsidized housing. In addition, NYCHA did not reevaluate the income of families who lost jobs due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“You could either apply and be put at the back of the line, or you were discouraged from applying at all at the point where the money was dwindling,” said housing advocate and Fordham Professor Norrinda Brown. 

According to the complaint, the ODTA was in charge of distributing ERAP funds to people who were having difficulties paying rent after pandemic-related job loss. The ODTA was supposed to help people regardless of whether they were in subsidized housing or not. 

Danielle Johnson, who lived at Astoria Houses in Queens and is one of the plaintiffs, met the federal eligibility criteria for ERAP.  She was laid off from her role as a medical biller during the pandemic. The widow was the only source of income for the unit she shared with her son.  She was allegedly discouraged from applying and never told she was eligible, according to the complaint.

ERAP applications opened in June 2021 and most of the funds were committed by October 2021. Brown said that while the amount of money was significant, there was not enough left for those receiving housing assistance. 

“It was no surprise that the money would run out, and the money did run out before subsidized tenants could receive any aid,” Brown said

Out of the 39,000 applicants for ERAP from NYCHA housing, only 15,000 were approved as of April 2024, the complaint says. 

The lawsuit also alleges that the ODTA’s and NYCHA’s prejudice was a violation of the state’s lawful source of income protection. The lawful source of income protection means that people in New York cannot be discriminated against due to receiving government assistance, including housing assistance. 

People can also not be discriminated against due to race, which is another part of the suit. 

As of February 2023, rental data says 44 percent of NYCHA tenants are black and 45 percent Hispanic. Brown said that since most residents affected by the deprioritization of ERAP were of this demographic, this is grounds for racial discrimination. 

“If what happened was that NYCHA and the state had said, all black people will have to wait until whites and others are paid, and if there’s any money left, your hardship can be considered,” Brown said. ” We all have a gut reaction to that and realize that that was illegal and against the law.”

Tenants Were Expected to Pay Rent Based on Income They No Longer Had

In addition to being denied assistance available to everyone else, the complaint alleges that NYCHA did not adjust the rent for many residents who lost their jobs due to pandemic layoffs. 

According to the NYCHA FAQ page, rent for residents is adjusted based on income to no more than 30 percent of gross income. If someone is unemployed, then the rent should be adjusted to zero. The rent adjustment is supposed to take effect by the first of the month after the income change if the resident reports the change within 30 days, the NYCHA website says. 

Plaintiff Wanda Baez was a teacher but her school ceased operations during the pandemic. She applied for ERAP but was deemed ineligible to apply due to her living in a NYCHA residence. During this time she experienced illness and her sister died from COVID-19. She applied in August of 2021 not knowing that her application would remain pending until this day. 

On top of that, NYCHA left her responsible for her rent based on a $55,000 annual income, which was no longer the case after she lost her job. She emailed NYCHA twice about her application for rental assistance. The lack of communication and income readjustment left Baez “alarmed, confused, and helpless.”

She eventually heard back from NYCHA but in the form of a consumer debt lawsuit for not paying the rent adjusted to her not-ceased income source. Her case is pending and proceeding to mediation according to court filings in February. She owes over $46,000 to NYCHA for her residence in the Bronx from March 2020 to November 2022. 

Johnson also has a consumer debt case against her for the $28,000 she amassed in rent during the pandemic. Like Baez, her case is pending. 

James Rodriguez from the Residents to Preserve Public Housing, an advocacy group and one of the plaintiffs in the case, said that he sees NYCHA “pointing the finger” at residents for many issues they could not help, including unpaid rent and long-needed maintenance. 

Brown also said that NYCHA leaders have blamed residents for unpaid rent when they were ineligible for federal assistance and lost their income source. One of her reasons for filing the class action lawsuit was due to the NYCHA media stories about unpaid rent and debt. 

The State Admitted to This Mistake

A New York State Comptroller’s report from July 2023 said that people in public housing were not prioritized in the rental assistance program. The report acknowledged that many in public housing have not received any funds and that New York was one of the last states to finish distributing funds. 

As a result, the state reportedly provided $356 million in additional funds for ERAP applications existing at the time of its release but said that it may not have been enough to address the high rent burdens affecting residents. 

In June of 2021, the ODTA page for ERAP said that those in public housing would only be considered for assistance after all other applications. This was not consistent with the federal guidelines from the treasury department, which said that public housing residents should be considered along with other applicants. 

The Fight for Justice

The class action lawsuit has only just begun and Brown said that there was a long process ahead, but Rodriguez said that the fight for help has been ongoing to the point that it took time away from other priorities with his organization. 

Brown has filed an injunction to keep ODTA and NYCHA from pursuing evictions and consumer debt cases until after the court reviews the complaint. Meanwhile, Brown said that NYCHA can still recertify income changes and provide retribution for those who fell behind on rent during the pandemic. 

“This whole scheme is sending families further into deep poverty when it could have been handled so so much differently,” Brown said.

NYCHA and the ODTA denied a request for comment citing a policy against commenting on pending litigation. 

By Jean Brannum | jbrannum@queensledger.com

In Diversity Plaza in Flushing, community leaders advocated for the Metropolitan Park to be built on the Citi Field parking lot on May 13. 

Between chants saying “Why not us” and signs with catchphrases like “D13 for Metropolitan Park,” people gathered in support of the parking lot to be turned into a park that will bring jobs, entertainment, and green space to the surrounding neighborhoods. Karl Rickett from the Coalition for Queens Advancement said that the project is estimated to create over 23,000 union jobs.

The proposed Metropolitan Park will include a casino, the most contentious part that has some people against the idea. However, Mets Owner Steve Cohen is moving forward with the project. A survey from State Senator Jessica Ramos showed mixed results of approval and disapproval for a casino in the district. Ramos is undecided about supporting or being against the park, according to Olga Reyes from Voices of D13. 

Reyes, who emceed the rally, wants Ramos and other people to support the project. The casino would bring in the money for the other parts of the parks. She said that she wants more families, including her own, to have more green space. She also wants to have more hotels nearby for visiting family members. 

Attendee Samuel Phuntsog approves of the idea and commented that the casino is only a small part of the park and the project would bring greenery to the “concrete jungle”

“I think even if there’s a casino, at least there’s some better things coming around. That place doesn’t even have trees,” Phuntsog said. 

Jim Burke, a transit advocate from 34th Ave Open Street said that after speaking with officials from the Mets baseball team, he supports the significant infrastructure improvements that would come with the project, including creating safe bike paths around the park, and subway station improvements 

“Going into the Roosevelt station is dark, grimy, and unpleasant. Riding your bicycle on a very narrow bridge and sharing with pedestrians is very unpleasant,” Burke said. “What this is going to finally bring is amazing infrastructure projects.”

Eddie Valentin, owner of the Friend’s Tavern, the oldest active gay bar in Queens, said that he wants the park because it will provide more small business opportunities. As a long-time Queens resident, he was never asked for his opinion on anything until Cohen pulled him into a meeting and asked for his opinion on what he could do for the community. 

“We made suggestions, they were heard, and, what I’m seeing, it looks like they’re being respected. So because of that, I say we do this”

According to the Metropolitan Park website, the company, Queens Metro, has conducted over 500 meetings with community leaders to decide the best uses for the park. 

The casino project is one of eleven potential projects that could receive one of three gaming licenses the state will distribute.