Some elected officials have begun to focus on eating disorders as more young people are suffering from esteem issues. Think it’s not really an issue? If someone you’re related to doesn’t have an eating disorder, then someone you know probably does.  It wasn’t always like that.  Eating disorders are becoming more and more common as advertising and television tells us who and what is beautiful. Add to that the explosion of social networking sites, where people share photos with the world, and you have a real reason to feel self conscious.

 

Self image disorders are no longer relegated to young women. 1 in 10 people that are reported as having an eating disorder are men. Kristina Saffran of Douglaston, along with two friends Becky Allen and Liana Rosenman, started Project HEAL (www.theprojectheal.org) in order to raise money for young people with eating disorders. The goal of this organization is to help place people that want help with eating disorders in treatment facilities.

 

This is by no means a make-shift vanity group for these young women to put on their resume. Project HEAL was incorporated in May of 2008, and they are now pending 501-c3 status. They have already placed people in facilities due to their ability to tap funding streams.

 

Project HEAL is planning a dress sale in Douglaston on Saturday May 23^rd between the hours of 2pm -5pm, at The Douglaston Club.  The group focuses on three types of eating disorders, anorexia, bulimia, and binge eaters. These three women met and became friends when they were hospitalized with eating disorders. They decided a year ago to help other people with esteem issues.

 

Legislatively, Assemblyman Felix Ortiz (New York AD 51) has been pretty active in starting The Comprehensive Care Center for Eating Disorders, which has a 24 Hour Toll Free Hotline: 1-888-747-4727. New Jersey State Senator Joe Vitale is helping to launch STAR (States for Treatment, Access, and Research). Vitale wants medical professionals to be trained and familiar with eating disorders. He also wants to see health care organizations recognize eating disorders as real illnesses.

 

Eating disorders are often about empowerment, or the false sense of it. “You want control over your body, so you think that by controlling your weight, you are exercising control – but it really is a lack of control”, says Saffran. What eating disorders do is similar to depression – it takes the individual out of their lives. Suddenly a person that was very focused on their career or schooling is now obsessed with how they feel about their identity.

 

A few years ago, I became good friends with Ben Kramer of Vancouver. Ben was autistic, as well as a mountain climber, photographer, and a marathon swimmer. Like these young women, Ben raised awareness and money for his cause. He stayed at my apartment one weekend and wound up telling me that he suffered from depression. He told me was on medication, and that if he had not gotten help, he never would have accomplished such amazing things, such as swimming around Manhattan (21 miles non-stop) for 16 years in a row. He got himself back on track, and his life became incredible.

 

Project HEAL aims to get people back on track. Visit their website, and you will be able to read about the experiences of the three founders. They openly tell their story, and they openly wish to help you if you need it. The three of them are around seventeen years old, and they run a completely professional organization.  Here is hoping you never need the help of Project HEAL, but also that you will help them in their mission.

This is the absolute worst time for the city to raise the price of public transportation fares. While it may be easy for the non-elected to make such claims, the people that are elected are expected to offer some creativity in this situation. The government, both local and national, has been encouraging people to use public transportation ever since oil prices shot up a few years ago. The 30-day unlimited ride metro card will go up from $81 to $103 if the MTA’s now approved plan becomes reality.

 

Much has gone wrong; the economy tanked in the last year and this is still a very expensive subway system to run.  If fares went to $2.50 per ride, although it is pricey, it is still a good deal considering that you can get to almost any place in the city for a relatively low price. The 30-day Metrocard increase, however, is an entirely different ballgame. These are people that are making a commitment to our transportation system on a daily basis. Monthly users are doing exactly what the government asked, and now they stand to be punished.

 

The Straphangers Campaign has been active in listing alternative plans on their website – such as the Ravich plan – and notifying people as to where hearings will be. But where is the New York State Green Party in all of this? This is an environmental issue that has a dramatic effect on the city. It’s also an issue where there is still room to win. If the Green Party got as involved in this as the Straphangers Campaign, you might see a change in attitude in Albany. This is a golden opportunity for this party to claim legitimacy. Instead, their state website mentions little about the New York City subway fare hikes. Go to their Twitter account (http://twitter.com/gpny/) and you will see comments on things that completely irrelevant to being an environmentalist. A few tweets from the Greens:

 

·         Obama should reverse course and reject Bush-Cheney policies on the drug war, illegal surveillance, executive power, and Social Security

·         New York Finds More Votes for President from Last November

 

Really?! Is this what the NYS Green Party is thinking about? Are they really that concerned with how many lost votes Obama may have gotten? Is anyone disputing that he won? Someone should reach this party – tell them there is a real environmental issue happening in a very popular city.

 

The focus in this fight should be to fight for a partial victory. Keep the 30-day Metrocard at $81 a month. It encourages people to use the system more often. If they use the TransitChek Program, they can have their employers take that money from their earnings tax free. It’s a little bit of help.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paterson and the NY Film Tax Credit Anthony Stasi

Not long ago, I walked along a street lined with brownstones, and black painted stoops. A few potholes on the ground were illuminated by drooping street lights. Some garbage pails were covered, some not. There a few ‘For Rent’ signs in the windows. A genuine ‘New York’ street…in Los Angeles. I was visiting a few friends from a past life that work at Paramount Pictures. New York Street is the street they contract out for commercials or use for New York-style television shows and movies. It felt real enough for me to think I couldn’t afford anything on this plastic set.

This great backdrop aside, our city draws a lot of business from filmmakers and producers that want to shoot here in the real city. Governor Paterson is now weighing whether the New York Film and Tax Credit is worth holding on to, when there are so many other areas (police, teachers, and emergency services to name a few) that might need funding more. Those areas do need whatever funding we have the most – no questions asked. But the TV and Film Tax Credit allows New York to keep its identity to some degree.

The industries that made New York what it is have either left, or are on life support (namely, manufacturing and Wall Street). Film, television, and theatre are part of what make New York special. Even though other cities have entertainment, nothing can compare to that of New York City.

The Tax Credit was increased by 30% not long ago. Times changed fast, and maybe we need to lower the rate of increase from 30% to perhaps 20%. This would keep the profitable government effort alive.

What many of us are too young to remember is when New York was home to major beer breweries, before losing them to New Jersey over production costs. Those were good union jobs. We may not remember the garment district as it was once, with factories pumping – even though so many of those women earned less than they should have gotten.

Now, what is left is our mystique. New York – people get so angry over the city and then defend it vehemently should it be criticized by an outsider. What is left is a stock market on welfare and an entertainment industry. We have to show good faith with the entertainment industry, or we might lose them to a plastic replica of our city. This is why we need to hold on to the Film and Television Tax Credit.

Score one for typical Washington politics. The Washington DC vouchers program was defeated in the senate last week by a 58-39 vote. Last week I wrote about how important this program was to kids on the lower economic scale. I know that I benefitted from a school where education was a priority and discipline and values were always a part of the curriculum. Private schooling does not work for every child, but the kids in the Washington DC area had a chance to try something new. What’s more, if the public school system complains of overcrowding, wouldn’t they benefit with some kids going to a different school? Well the votes are in. Here are the senators that sent these kids back to a failed school system:

NAYs ---58

Akaka (D-HI)

Baucus (D-MT)

Bayh (D-IN)

Begich (D-AK)

Bennet (D-CO)

Bingaman (D-NM)

Boxer (D-CA)

Brown (D-OH)

Burris (D-IL)

Cantwell (D-WA)

Cardin (D-MD)

Carper (D-DE)

Casey (D-PA)

Conrad (D-ND)

Crapo (R-ID)

Dodd (D-CT)

Dorgan (D-ND)

Durbin (D-IL)

Feingold (D-WI)

Feinstein (D-CA) Gillibrand (D-NY)

Hagan (D-NC)

Harkin (D-IA)

Inouye (D-HI)

Johnson (D-SD)

Kaufman (D-DE)

Kerry (D-MA)

Klobuchar (D-MN)

Kohl (D-WI)

Landrieu (D-LA)

Lautenberg (D-NJ)

Leahy (D-VT)

Levin (D-MI)

Lincoln (D-AR)

McCaskill (D-MO)

Menendez (D-NJ)

Merkley (D-OR)

Mikulski (D-MD)

Murkowski (R-AK)

Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL)

Nelson (D-NE)

Pryor (D-AR)

Reed (D-RI)

Reid (D-NV)

Rockefeller (D-WV)

Sanders (I-VT)

Schumer (D-NY)

Shaheen (D-NH)

Snowe (R-ME)

Specter (R-PA)

Stabenow (D-MI)

Tester (D-MT)

Udall (D-CO)

Udall (D-NM)

Webb (D-VA)

Whitehouse (D-RI)

Wyden (D-OR)

There are good arguments on both sides. I know the unions spent a lot of money trying to shut this down. But the most compelling argument for the DC Voucher program was that it was working. We’re one country – and this week we defunded a program that was working, and sent kids into another program that was not working so well. Change we can believe in?

When Good Policy Falls Due to Politics Anthony Stasi

Most students of good government policy look at school vouchers programs with a degree of skepticism. Vouchers that would allow a student to attend a private institution can make civil libertarians worry that government money might fund a religious based school. Another concern about vouchers is that as public funding comes into a private school, will the private schools lose the much needed control they have over the academic process? Teachers unions are another major roadblock to voucher programs. Unions know that once students in poorly performing schools get a taste of private education, the public school system, as the lumbering and wobbly machine that it can be, is at risk. And that’s a system that works for careers, even if it fails children at times.

Vouchers are a hot button issue, and the concerns are understandable. Our current economic times, however, are an opportunity to try new things. Washington DC has an experimental vouchers program that was put in place by the Republican controlled congress five years ago. It was an experiment. The kids in this school district had nothing to lose. Their public school system had failed them. Now, the children and parents want this program to remain. But the current congress has no intention of extending the voucher program. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, (D-Washington DC) said to the Washington Post, “I can tell you that the Democratic Congress is not about to extend this program."

Give credit to congressional Democrats for sticking to their guns on the issue. But what is the consequence when they shut this program down? After all of the ‘Thank You’ notes from the opponents of the program (none of whom have children in these poorly performing schools) are sent to congress, these kids get sent back to schools that have not improved since their exodus to better education five years ago.

Remember that the kids in this district were in such a bad school district that this program was attempted in the first place, and it is welcomed by the current DC schools’ chancellor Michelle Rhee – appointed by Democratic Mayor of Washington DC Adrian Fenty. Any member of congress that votes to send these kids back to a failing school should be willing to send their children to these schools.

Perhaps as a national educational program vouchers are not the answer. Maybe some of the opponents are right. But in a situation where it is hopeless – where everything else has been tried – why not give kids in a rough area a chance?

Michelle Rhee is a graduate of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. She has taught in Baltimore and Washington. She started The New Teacher Project that recruited 10,000 new teachers in 20 states. She was told recently that she had to prepare to re-enroll the students that will have to come back to the public system, once the current congress lets this program fizzle out in the fall of 2010. Her words, "I don't think vouchers are going to solve all the ills of public education, but parents who are zoned to schools that are failing kids should have options to do better by their kids."

This is not about helping rich kids get richer. It’s about helping poor children not get poorer.

Talking to Vince Tabone of the Queens GOP, you can feel the enthusiasm he has for newcomer Eric Ulrich, who is running for the vacant city council seat left by Sen. Joe Addabbo. Like Ulrich, I ran for office in this neck of the woods at a young age. It’s a good place to jump into to politics – even though Ulrich’s campaign slogan reads ‘People First. Not Politics.’ Ulrich, according to Tabone, has mounted this very professional campaign from very early on.

The field gets crowded in this neck of the woods. There are some formidable Democrats in this race. Oddly enough though, the only candidate that reminds one of now-State Senator Addabbo is Ulrich. Ulrich is a younger candidate that canvasses the district and doesn’t get distracted by other candidates’ agendas. Addabbo has that same trait. Is it enough for a 23 year old to get elected? Well, it’s still a district where the Democrats outnumber the Republicans 3-1.

Election Day is Tuesday. We will just have to see if Ulrich is able to get the vote out.

Solidarity has such a noble ring to it that you can see where students can get riled up in the word alone. The protests at New York University this week were viewed by many people, and many students, as less than stellar. The tactics used by the students was brought into question, but the reasoning for the protest is more interesting.

Written everywhere is how these were rich kids that were trying to show their muscle as malcontents when they really have little for which to complain. In fairness, they may not all be wealthy, but they probably knew what the tuition was before they agreed to attend NYU. A friend of mine that works for the Clinton Foundation went to Hunter College on a full scholarship. I asked him why he chose Hunter when he could have gone anyplace. He said that it was a good school and the price was right. An NYU education is worth every penny (and there are a lot of those) but the costs are something that students need to consider when they attend a private university.

Look closer at the protesters’ ‘occupation demands,’ and the protest is even more questionable. First on their list of demands was that they get amnesty for protesting. That’s first on their list! In other words, of all these things that matter to them, first on the list is that they cannot get into any trouble for this. Part of the romance of a hard fought protest is that you take the consequences.

The second demand is even better; “full compensation for all employees whose jobs were disrupted during the course of the occupation.” They’re referring to the disruption that they caused.

Here are ‘occupation demands’ seven and eight:

“Annual scholarships be provided for thirteen Palestinian students.”

“That the university donates all excess supplies and materials in an effort to rebuild the University of Gaza.”

There is no question that Gaza could use help as the city sits in the middle of a chaotic bombing campaign between Israel and the ruling Palestinian government. But where does NYU come in as having to be the source of this. Are there no Americans that can use this scholarship money? Are there no troubled educational institutions in the US that can use NYU’s excess supplies?

You’ve read about the closing of many Catholic schools in the city and around the country. There are clearly schools, both private and public (of higher and lower education) that are struggling and closing. There are students in the United States that need financial assistance.

The protesters demanded that all university workers earn a living wage, which makes sense. But while you might nod in agreement, consider that some these demands cost money. And where will that come from? See complaint #9, “Tuition stabilization for all students.”

I do agree with these students that tuition is too high and that most financial aid offices are not helpful enough.

Perhaps the most awkward part of this movement is the name, TakeBackNYU! This is a private university where people are very lucky to attend, after they applied to get in. It was never their institution to take back. It sounds similar to a kid living with his parents threatening to take back the house, from the owners that allow him to live there.

In the end, nobody got hurt – and that is a good thing. It was only a few years ago that NYU had a rash of suicides where students were jumping off of the top floors of the library. Passive resistance is never the worst thing in the world, even if the cause questionable.

City Councilman John Liu (D-20) is the transportation voice in the New York City Council. Recently Liu helped pass a law that made it illegal for automobiles to idle for more than one minute in school zones. The idea is that this is a step toward helping children with asthma.

The city may be in a better position today to introduce new legislation than it has been in years past. When Mayor Giuliani pushed for ‘workfare’ as an answer to welfare, there was a lot of opposition from unions. Today, however, there may be some wiggle room to push for similar types of policy that can improve transportation. Instead of looking at raising fares as the only means to cut costs, perhaps there are ways to get people to volunteer in order to get a break on fares.

A monthly Metrocard costs $81. Would I work for three hours a week (12 hours a month) cleaning subway cars for a free Metrocard? You bet I would. That’s a paltry $6.75 an hour. Think you can get subway cars cleaned for less than that? ‘Public works’ projects are the essence of climbing out of economic potholes.

Liu should think about something along these lines. Even if only 20 people (of the 3 million that use the subway every day) signed up, the city gets 240 hours of person-power at a cost that is so low it would otherwise be thought illegal.

But remember, I’m an Italian from Howard Beach, and I just might cover the seats in plastic.

What makes our economic times interesting in terms of government is the type of leadership we get from appointed government officials. Nothing about appointing someone to head a large and important agency is easy. Simply take a look at how choppy the water has been for the new president when choosing cabinet members.

Herbert Stupp was the commissioner for the New York City Department for the Aging (DFTA) for eight years under Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. Stupp is the Chief Executive Officer at Little Flower Children and Family Services of New York. Little Flower became a voice for abused and neglected children in 1929, when it was formed through St. Peter Claver Church in Bedford-Stuyvesant. Most of the children and the clergy then were African American. Little Flower is a quite diverse organization today, helping children all over New York. Little Flower has its roots in the Catholic tradition, but serves children from all backgrounds.

At DFTA, Stupp was in charge of a budget that lingered around $250 million. Today, he heads an organization that has a budget of around $50 million dollars and serves around 2,000 children and families. I get email from students majoring in public administration about this field as a career. Stupp’s journey is one of success, so it’s a good place to start when talking about public management.

The government employee, or public administrator, has – by definition- changed. The city gets a better employee today because there are people that actually study public administration beforehand. Generations ago, a man came back from military service, and if he found no other work, there was work with the government (often the post office was a good place for veterans to find work). It was a good way to reward veterans. Later, the government employee was often a person that just did not find work elsewhere and agencies were kept afloat out of political patronage. Because of this, the quality of service became that of the infamous Department of Motor Vehicles (which has since gotten much better).

What has changed? Well, it started with Stupp’s generation and continues today. People are going into public service, instead of falling into it. So their passion and energy are making for a better government. Managing in government is every bit as valuable as managing in the private sector. And we do not need to be reminded that the private sector does not always get things right.

Because these economic times are so pressing for us, I thought I would reach Stupp in order to better understand the differences in pressures faced by public administrators when they go from government to nonprofit organizations. The pressures are different, according to Stupp. “In a government agency, there is less risk of the agency itself going away,” explains Stupp. “With a nonprofit organization, it can fold if it cannot support itself. Many organizations have gone under recently, not us…but many others have.”

On the other hand, Stupp explains that his work at Little Flower is less tied to external, political worries. Commissioners of government agencies can be asked to leave for things for which they have no control. That is less likely in a non profit position.

Stupp’s work at the Department for the Aging is well remembered by former staff at the agency. When overhearing some folks that used to work at the agency talking about some of the scandals that the agency endured in the past, I asked if any of it was on Stupp’s watch. “Oh no…no way,” was the answer I got. Stupp’s eight years were considered successful and Mayor Giuliani would later write “I don’t think the DFTA has ever been better run, and I don’t think there’s ever been a time in which the senior citizens of this City feel the commitment of the City more than they do now.”

Organizations such as Little Flower and New York Families for Autistic Children have taken a big hit in recent years because much of the money that they hope to get by way of donations has slowed. What this creates is a need for expert leadership to pilot them through these tough times.

The New York State Conservative Party inviting Attorney General Andrew Cuomo to speak at its annual dinner signals no change in the ideology of the party. Conservative Party chairman Mike Long has always been a strong advocate of smaller government and tighter budgets. The state’s fourth largest political party is really the third largest. The Independence Party is third only because the name of the party confuses newly registered voters that want to remain independent, and so they unwittingly check of the capital “I” – Independence Party. Truly independent voters would check of “I do not wish to enroll in a party” in order to be independent.

So, for the sake of honesty, let’s just say the state’s ‘quite large’ fourth party is the Conservative Party. The party was formed following the ideological footsteps of Barry Goldwater’s presidential campaign. It was created to push the then left leaning Republican Party back to the right. The theory was to then disband the party once the GOP moved away from Rockefeller’s liberal Republicanism.

Andrew Cuomo is proposing to streamline local governments. It’s a bold and interesting idea. For the longest time, Long Island and upstate New York politicians have created these separate government entities as a means to give patronage jobs to friends and supporters. Now the Attorney General is suggesting we revisit all this in order to make government more responsive and less expensive. Mike Long thinks it is worth considering. After all, the Conservative Party’s candidates are often not part of the patronage machine. Conservative Party candidates run on their own money and, while they do not often get elected (unless they share a line with Republicans or Democrats,) they rarely owe anyone anything in return.

It is for this reason that Long has stayed true to his ideology. People have criticized the Conservative Party for endorsing pro-choice candidates in recent years, but what lights up the core of the party – a belief in a smaller government - still shines. Mike Long doesn’t care if Cuomo is a Democrat, he cares that someone is talking about fixing government.

This is clearly an effort by Cuomo to court support for some future race. It is not the work that we expect from an attorney general, but Cuomo is better at policy than he is at campaigning, and so opportunities to talk about policy are important to him. If Cuomo can make the case that he wants to introduce a bold plan to restructure government and save tax payers money, he is speaking to the right crowd.

For too long the Conservatives have been stereotyped as people living in another era that belong to a value system not entirely compatible with today’s America. Now, with budgets in every state being squeezed and a federal government that spent the last eight years writing blank checks, it appears that the Conservatives were right on many of these counts.

Long may not say if the party is willing to endorse Cuomo, which would be interesting since Cuomo’s father was the voice of liberalism – or anti-Reaganism - in the 1980s. But putting Cuomo on their line should be brought with a degree of caution. Remember that Cuomo was once a gubernatorial candidate on the New York State Liberal Party line. When he agreed to drop out of the race, he remained on the Liberal line. He received very few votes (around 16,000) and so the Liberal Party lost its automatic slot on the New York State ballot. If Cuomo did the same thing on the Conservative Party line, he could, in effect, sink that party as well. Unless that is his ultimate plan, which in this case makes him a genius, or an evil genius…depending on how you vote.